The High Commercial Court recently ruled in favor of a food supply company in a case against a commercial center. The court ordered the center to pay over BD26,000 for the goods it received in 2022. The center had previously denied the invoices without providing any proof of payment. Legal interest at a rate of 4% per year from December 2022 until full payment was also granted, and the center was ordered to pay the costs of the lawsuit.
The dispute originated from a contract between the food supply company and the commercial center. Despite delivering the required food items, the center failed to pay the owed amount of BD26,685.094. Subsequently, the supplier filed a lawsuit seeking payment. The supplier’s lawyer provided copies of the invoices, signed and stamped by the center’s employees, as evidence of delivery. However, the center disputed the authenticity of the invoices and signatures, leading to a court investigation.
During the proceedings, the court heard testimonies from two witnesses for the supplier, while the center did not present any witnesses. The witnesses confirmed that the food items were delivered to the center based on purchase orders issued between April and August 2022. Additionally, it was noted that despite requests, the center did not make the payment. Based on the evidence and testimonies, the court established the existence of a contractual relationship and ruled in favor of the supplier.
As a result of the court’s decision, the commercial center is obligated to pay the food supply company the claimed amount of BD26,685.094, along with legal interest at a rate of 4% per year from the due date of December 22, 2022, until full payment is made. Moreover, the center was directed to cover the costs of the lawsuit and attorney’s fees. This ruling underscores the importance of upholding contractual obligations and ensuring fair treatment in commercial transactions.
In conclusion, the High Commercial Court’s ruling in favor of the food supply company serves as a reminder of the legal consequences of failing to fulfill payment obligations. The decision highlights the significance of honoring contractual agreements and conducting business transactions in good faith. By ordering the commercial center to pay the outstanding amount along with legal interest and costs, the court reaffirmed the principle of justice and accountability in commercial disputes. Businesses should strive to maintain transparency and integrity in their dealings to avoid costly legal battles and uphold the rule of law.
