A controversial proposal to halve traffic fines for quick payment is once again under scrutiny in Bahrain, sparking debate over its potential impact on road safety and compliance. The proposed amendment to the Traffic Law, allowing offenders to settle violations by paying 50% of the minimum fine within 30 days, has returned to the Shura Council despite previous rejection. This article delves into the details of the debate, the concerns raised by key committees, and the path forward for this potentially impactful traffic fine settlement law.
Shura Council Faces Renewed Pressure on Traffic Fine Amendment
The Shura Council is set to revisit the draft law concerning traffic fine settlement this Sunday, following a renewed vote of support from the Council of Representatives on November 11, 2025. This marks the second time the upper chamber is being asked to reconsider the amendment, as per Article 84 of the Constitution. The core of the proposal lies in modifying Article 56 of the existing Traffic Law to introduce a standardized settlement option: 50% of the minimum fine payable within a 30-day period.
This seemingly straightforward change has ignited a strong opposition within the Shura Council’s Foreign Affairs, Defence and National Security Committee. The committee has formally recommended upholding its initial decision to reject the draft in principle, signaling a potential roadblock for the amendment.
The Committee’s Core Concerns
The committee’s primary argument centers around the potential weakening of incentives for prompt payment. Currently, Article 56 allows for settlements on a specified list of offenses, with reduced amounts tied to payment within seven days. This shorter timeframe encourages offenders to resolve issues quickly, minimizing the burden on the judicial system and promoting responsible behavior.
Removing the seven-day provision and replacing it with a 30-day window, the committee believes, would diminish this incentive. They argue that a longer period for reduced payment could lead to more individuals delaying settlement, potentially increasing the overall number of cases progressing to the Public Prosecution. This could strain resources and slow down the resolution of traffic violations Bahrain.
Recent Legislative Changes Add Complexity
Adding another layer of complexity, the committee highlighted the recent enactment of Decree-Law No. 30 of 2025. This decree amended the Traffic Law, notably increasing fines and expanding the list of offenses eligible for settlement.
The committee contends that the proposed 30-day, 50% settlement rule doesn’t align well with these recent, more stringent changes. They fear it could undermine the deterrent effect of the increased penalties, effectively softening the blow for some offenders. This misalignment is a key factor driving their recommendation for rejection.
Balancing Deterrence and Accessibility: The Underlying Debate
The disagreement over this amendment reflects a broader debate about the balance between deterring traffic offenses and providing accessible options for resolution. Proponents of the 30-day settlement argue it offers a more convenient and financially manageable solution for some offenders, particularly those facing multiple or substantial fines. They believe it could encourage more people to settle their debts, ultimately improving compliance rates.
However, the committee firmly believes that maintaining a strong deterrent effect is paramount, especially given the potential for serious consequences resulting from road safety breaches. They emphasize that fines are not merely revenue generators but crucial tools for discouraging reckless driving and protecting lives. The committee’s report specifically stresses the need for penalties to be proportionate to the offense, particularly those that could lead to injury or death.
The Role of the Council of Representatives
The Council of Representatives’ repeated endorsement of the amendment underscores the elected chamber’s desire to address the financial burden of traffic fines on citizens and residents. Their insistence on reconsideration, invoking Article 84 of the Constitution, demonstrates the importance they place on this issue.
This back-and-forth between the two chambers highlights the checks and balances inherent in Bahrain’s legislative system. It also emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the potential ramifications of any changes to the Traffic Law.
What Happens Next?
The Shura Council’s discussion on Sunday will be pivotal. While the committee’s recommendation carries significant weight, the Council is not bound to follow it. A full chamber vote will determine whether the amendment proceeds, is rejected again, or is sent back to the Council of Representatives with specific revisions.
If the Shura Council rejects the amendment for a second time, the matter could potentially be referred to a joint committee of both chambers to attempt a compromise. However, the strong stance taken by the Foreign Affairs, Defence and National Security Committee suggests a significant hurdle remains for the proposed traffic fine settlement scheme.
Ultimately, the outcome will shape the landscape of traffic law enforcement and compliance in Bahrain. The debate serves as a reminder of the complex considerations involved in crafting legislation that effectively balances individual rights, public safety, and the need for a fair and just legal system.
It remains to be seen whether the Shura Council will prioritize accessibility and encourage quicker settlements, or uphold its commitment to strong deterrence and maintain the existing framework. Readers are encouraged to follow the proceedings of the Shura Council and engage in discussions about this important issue.