The Finnish parliament recently approved a controversial bill that allows border guards to reject third-country migrants attempting to enter from Russia. This decision comes in response to what Helsinki perceives as “hybrid warfare” tactics from Russia, claiming that Moscow is directing undocumented migrants towards the border to create an influx of immigration. The law, valid for one year, permits border guards to turn away migrant asylum applications under specific circumstances, with exceptions for vulnerable individuals such as children and the disabled.
Prime Minister Petteri Orpo defended the law as necessary for national security, citing Russia’s alleged attempts to orchestrate migrant surges at the Finnish border. However, critics including academics, legal experts, and human rights groups argue that the law violates Finland’s Constitution, international human rights agreements, and EU commitments. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Michael O’Flaherty voiced concerns about the draft law prior to its approval, urging against its adoption. The closure of the 1,340-kilometre land border with Russia last year was prompted by over 1,300 undocumented migrants entering Finland in just three months after the nation joined NATO.
The approval of the controversial bill by Finnish lawmakers has sparked debate and criticism from various quarters. While some support the measures as necessary for national security in the face of perceived threats from Russia, opponents argue that the law breaches international human rights standards and Finland’s own Constitution. Human rights groups have expressed concern that vulnerable individuals may be put at risk due to the new legislation, which allows border guards to reject asylum applications from certain third-country migrants.
The law, valid for a year, aims to curb the entry of undocumented migrants at the Finnish border with Russia, following allegations of Moscow’s involvement in directing migrants towards the Nordic nation. This move is seen as a response to what Helsinki views as “hybrid warfare” tactics aimed at destabilizing the region. However, the law’s approval has raised concerns about potential violations of human rights and international agreements, prompting criticism from legal experts, academics, and rights advocates.
Opponents of the bill have raised concerns about the impact on vulnerable groups, such as children and disabled individuals, who may be affected by the law’s provisions. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Michael O’Flaherty has expressed reservations about the legislation, warning that it could lead to human rights violations. The controversial nature of the bill reflects the complex geopolitical dynamics at play along the Finnish border with Russia, highlighting the challenges of balancing national security concerns with respect for international human rights standards.
As Finland grapples with the implications of the new law, the debate over immigration policies and border security continues to unfold. The government’s decision to approve the bill has drawn both support and criticism, with questions raised about the potential impact on vulnerable migrants seeking asylum. The enforcement of the law will be closely monitored in the coming months, with stakeholders keeping a watchful eye on how it is implemented and whether it upholds Finland’s obligations under international law.
